The U.S. Senate is set to vote on September 15 at2:15 p.m. ET on cloture for the motion to proceed to the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act, or H.R. 3633, according to the Senate schedule.
The cloture motion will be the bill’s next major procedural test and will determine whether the Senate can move closer to formally taking up the legislation. If cloture is invoked, the Senate would limit debate on the motion to proceed, clearing a key hurdle toward formally taking up the bill.
Reuters reported that crypto groups and banking organizations are intensifying lobbying ahead of the vote. This highlights that the outcome is still contested rather than assured.
On May 14, 2026, the bill cleared the Senate Banking Committee 15–9, with bipartisan support. The bill’s corestructure would establish clearer roles for the SEC and CFTC and setdisclosure, registration, market-oversight, and anti-money laundering requirements for digital asset intermediaries.
Passing the bill would move the U.S. closer to a statutory framework for exchanges and brokers. For token issuers and intermediaries, the legislation could clarify which federal regulatory framework applies to particular digital assets and activities.
Clarity Act Faces DeFi, Stablecoin, and Ethics Hurdles
The Clarity Act faces several challenges that could complicate its progress in the Senate. DeFi remains one of the most contentious areas. Republicans argue the bill protects software developers while regulating entities that exercise meaningful control. Senate Banking Democrats, however, argue the current text leaves significant gaps in illicit finance and investor protections.
Other sticking points include a battle between banks and the crypto industry over how to treat stablecoin rewards. Likewise, serious concerns remain about ethics provisions addressing potential conflicts of interest tied to President Donald Trump’s crypto interests, including World Liberty Financial and the TRUMP memecoin.
On July 22, 2026, Trump agreed to an ethics provision that bars public officials, federal employees, and their spouses from issuing or sponsoring digital assets. The Justice Department, not state attorneys general, would enforce the provision, which would expire in January 2029. However, Democrats criticized the ethics provision language as “insufficient.” Sens. ThomTillis, R-N.C., and Ruben Gallego, D-Ariz., later proposed alternative ethics language.
Senate Republicans Unveil Revised Clarity Act
On September 10, 2026, Sen. Cynthia Lummis and other Senate Republicans released a 630-pager evised version of the Clarity Act.
Sen. Lummis said, “We have incorporated more than 114 separate provisions at my Democrat colleagues' request, and as a result, this bill is a strong bipartisan product. Unlike rulemaking, legislation gives this industry a lasting solution that shields it from the whiplash of changes in the White House.”
One of the most significant additions concerns what the bill calls “non-decentralized finance trading protocols.”
“This updated Clarity Act text reflects bipartisan hard workover August—specifying when decentralized-in-name-only DeFi protocols must register with the CFTC and limiting the DeFi provisions to spot and cash transactions, in response to Native American concerns about prediction markets,” Sen. Lummis wrote on X.
Revised Bill Adds CFTC Rules for Controllable DeFi Protocols
The revised framework includes rule making for those “non-decentralized finance trading protocols.” It describes these as an individual or group that “act in concert, has the authority, directly or indirectly, through any contract, arrangement, understanding, relationship, or otherwise, to control or materially alter the functionality, operation, or rules of consensus or agreement of the decentralized finance trading protocol.”
Covered protocols would have to register with the CFTC, and the CFTC and Treasury Department would be directed to develop additional rules.
These changes attempt to draw a clearer regulatory line between genuinely decentralized software and crypto platforms where identifiable parties retain meaningful control.
The revised text also limits the DeFi provisions to spot and cash digital commodity transactions. Sen. Lummis said the change was intended, in part, to address tribal governments' concerns aboutthe Clarity Act’s impact on prediction markets. It also clarifies how credit unions may conduct crypto activities.
Sen. Lummis, who is not seeking another term and will leave Congress in January 2027, has made passage of the legislation a priority before her departure.
“We didn’t cede the internet to Europe, and we can’t afford to cede digital assets the same way. The Clarity Act allows the United States to write these rules instead of watching from the sidelines while Singapore or the UAE write them for us. Our country has a long history of leading. We cannot break from that tradition,” Sen. Lummis posted on X.
Democratic Support Remains Key Ahead of September 15 Vote
Politico reported that the revised version of the bill still appears short of the Democratic support needed to comfortably clear the Senate’s procedural hurdles.
The latest draft still includes no significant changes to the ethics provision, including its Justice Department-led enforcement mechanism.
If enacted, the Clarity Act could reshape the U.S. cryptomarket structure by defining boundaries between the SEC and CFTC and establishing federal rules for exchanges, brokers, token issuers, and certain DeFi platforms.
For now, the September 15 cloture vote on the motion to proceed will provide the clearest test yet of whether months of negotiations have produced enough bipartisan support to move the legislation forward.
Sign up on WEEX and roll for a chance to win a share of the $1,000,000 prize pool.
